References

1

Assessment of Performance Unit Secondary Survey Reports No. 1 (1980), No. 2 (1981), No. 3 (1982), Mathematical development, HMSO, London.

2

Assessment of Performance Unit (1985), A review of monitoring in mathematics 1978--82 (2 vols), Department of Education and Science, London.

3

Cockcroft, W.H. (1982): Mathematics counts, Report of the Committee of Enquiry, HMSO, London.

4

Coe, R. and Ruthven, K. (1994): Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematics students, British Educational Research Journal, 20 (1), 41--53.

5

Dainton, (Lord) Dr. F. S. (1968): Enquiry into the flow of candidates in science and technology into higher education, HMSO, London.

6

David, Jr, E. E. (1984): Renewing US mathematics: critical resource for the future, Washington DC, National Academy Press.

7

Dearing, Sir Ron. (1985): Review of 16--19 qualifications, COI, London.

8

DfE (1994): Science and maths, DfE, London.

9

Engineering Council (1985): The changing mathematical background of undergraduate engineers (R. Sutherland and S. Pozzi), Engineering Council, London.

10

Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. and Vincent, L. (1994): Candidates' performance in public examinations in mathematics and science, SCAA, London.

11

Fletcher, W. C. (1912): The position of mathematics in secondary schools in England, Board of Education Special Reports on Educational Subjects, vol 1, 90--103.

12

Hart, K. M., et al (1981): Children's understanding of mathematics 11--16, John Murray, London.

13

Higgiinson Committee (1988): Advancing A-levels, HMSO, London.

14

HMI (1985): Mathematics from 5 to 16, No. 3 in the `Curriculum matters' series, HMSO, London.

15

IAEP (1989): A world of differences, ETS, Boston, USA.

16

Institute of Mathematics and its Applications (1995): Mathematics matters in engineering, IMA, Southend.

17

Institute of Physics (1994): The case for change in post-16 physics: planning for the 21st Century, written by the Institute of Physics 16--19 Working Party.

18

Lord, K. et al (1995): Mathematics for progression from advanced GNVQs to higher education, Mechanics in Action Project, Manchester University.

19

McKnight, C. C. et al (1987): The underachieving curriculum, Stipes, Champaign, Illinois, USA.

20

National Curriculum (1994): SCAA, London.

21

Nuttall, D. L. Backhouse, J. K. and Wilmott, A. S. (1974): Comparability of standards between subjects, Evans/Methuen Educational.

22

OFSTED (1994): Science and mathematics in schools, HMSO, London.

23

Prais, S. (1994): Economic performance and education, the nature of Britain's deficiencies, Proc. Brit. Acad., 84, 151--207.

24

Robitaille, D. F. and Garden, R. A. (1989): The IEA study of mathematics II: Contexts and outcomes of school mathematics, Pergammon.

25

Royal Society (1991): Beyond GCSE, Royal Society, London.

26

Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (1995): Post-18 education, The Council for Industry and Higher Education.

27

Whitehead, A. N. (1922): The rhythm of education, (reprinted in The aims of education and other essays, Ernst Benn, London, 1966).